Re: No exceptions?
From: Erwin <e.smout_at_myonline.be>
Date: 4 Jul 2006 01:24:06 -0700
Message-ID: <1152001446.352262.70770_at_b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Date: 4 Jul 2006 01:24:06 -0700
Message-ID: <1152001446.352262.70770_at_b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
> > If you don't agree to go by
> > Date's definitions, then don't argue with anyone who does.
>
> Why on earth not? Firstly, I don't contradict Date, and secondly, any
> hypothetical disagreement with Date does not disqualify me from the
> discussion.
> Oh, and what about those who don't agree to Date's definitions of the
> extend operator, or of summarisation vs. aggregation? Should they shut
> up too ?
They should not shut up, but debating the issue becomes impossible unless it is clearly specified what the alternative views are precisely.
> --
> Erwin
Received on Tue Jul 04 2006 - 10:24:06 CEST