Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count)
From: Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries_at_acm.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:48:41 -0400
Message-ID: <bmlja2h16e5qi1q749eeu3f0p7fqc4p7fs_at_4ax.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:48:41 -0400
Message-ID: <bmlja2h16e5qi1q749eeu3f0p7fqc4p7fs_at_4ax.com>
On 3 Jul 2006 09:04:21 -0700, "Marshall" <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> In favor of putting a common rule in the DBMS is that it is centralized. The
Why do you think that? Rules can be centralized in the middle tier just as well
as in the DB, can they not?
>> "Once and Only Once", or "DRY" principle suggests that it should be there.
>>
>> Another possibility for a location for such a rule is in a middle tier, where it
>> can also meet the DRY principle.
>
>But then you lose the centralization.
Are you concerned about people going "around" the middle tier, perhaps? I'd think that could be obviated with some simple security measures, couldn't it?
-- Ron Jeffries www.XProgramming.com I'm giving the best advice I have. You get to decide if it's true for you.Received on Tue Jul 04 2006 - 04:48:41 CEST