Re: RM's Canonical database
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 18:04:22 GMT
Message-ID: <GOypg.4687$pu3.108260_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 18:04:22 GMT
Message-ID: <GOypg.4687$pu3.108260_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Ron Jeffries wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 11:27:17 +0200, mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
>
>>Robert Martin wrote:
>>
>>>... business rules don't belong in the database.
>>
>>What, in your opinion, does belong in the database?
>
> Uh ... data?
'Data' is information represented suitably for machine processing. In what way are business rules not information or not represented suitably for machine processing? Received on Sat Jul 01 2006 - 20:04:22 CEST