Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count)
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 09:44:45 -0600
"mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message news:44a63f88$0$31653$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> Robert Martin wrote:
>> ... business rules don't belong in the database.
> What, in your opinion, does belong in the database?
Imagine that your database is used by multiple applications where each application has different business rules. IMO, this is one reason why one should not include business rules in a db. So the answer to your question is *data*.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- Received on Sat Jul 01 2006 - 17:44:45 CEST