Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count)

Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count)

From: Michael Gaab <mike-g_at_montana.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 09:44:45 -0600
Message-ID: <1151768194_19817@sp6iad.superfeed.net>

"mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message news:44a63f88$0$31653$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> Robert Martin wrote:
>
>> ... business rules don't belong in the database.
>
> What, in your opinion, does belong in the database?
>

Imagine that your database is used by multiple applications where each application has different business rules. IMO, this is one reason why one should not include business rules in a db. So the answer to your question is *data*.

Mike

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- Received on Sat Jul 01 2006 - 10:44:45 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US