Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:39:31 -0500
Message-ID: <2006070100393182327-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
On 2006-06-27 13:33:59 -0500, "Keith H Duggar" <duggar_at_alum.mit.edu> said:
>>> OO [...] is a computational model
>>> comprising a collection of features useful for
>>> constructing large unpredictable state machines from
>>> small predictable state machines or otherwise picked
>>> arbitrarily in the mid to late 1960's
I agree that some folks think about OO that way. They treat each object as a small predictable state machine and then interconnect them into a larger state machine (or rather a collaboration of small state machines). However, this description of interacting state machines can be used for any system at all. No matter what kind of system you have it will always be possible to boil it down into clusters of variables that are controled by clusters of functions such that each cluster forms a small and predictable state machine. So, in the end, this is not a description of OO at all.
-- Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) | email: unclebob_at_objectmentor.com Object Mentor Inc. | blog: www.butunclebob.com The Agile Transition Experts | web: www.objectmentor.com 800-338-6716 |Received on Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:39:31 CEST