Re: No exceptions?

From: Bob Badour <>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:46:27 GMT
Message-ID: <7kepg.4227$>

Jonathan Leffler wrote:

> paul c wrote:

>> Bob Badour wrote:
>> ...
>>> The way to avoid exceptions is to treat them as compile-time errors.
>> I take it you really mean "ONE way to avoid exceptions ...".  For one 
>> thing, I am interested in being able to express "x join y" in advance 
>> of defining a header for "x" (and I would like to evaluate it as well 
>> if that is logically possible!).

> Don't forget the converse problem - there was a relation y at compile
> time that was removed before runtime; there's no way to generate a
> compile time exception for the unexceptionable, but there are not many
> ways of avoiding a runtime exception if the compile time y had defined
> attributes (was not a synonym of DEE or DUM). Obviously, you could
> reinterpret the entire program in the light of what you find at runtime,
> but then why bother with the compilation in the first place? Even
> within a single program, you could have a relation y available when it
> is first interpreted that is dropped by the time the statement
> referencing it is executed. So, some runtime exceptions are nigh-on
> unavoidable, I think.

As soon as one drops y, whatever references it must either be dropped or become unusable. Thus, as soon as one compiles a statement that references any such resource, one would get a compile-time error. Instead of generating a compile-time error when compiling some program, one would get a compile time error when one tries to invoke the program. Received on Fri Jun 30 2006 - 20:46:27 CEST

Original text of this message