# Re: What databases have taught me

From: Aloha Kakuikanu <aloha.kakuikanu_at_yahoo.com>

Date: 30 Jun 2006 10:28:51 -0700

Message-ID: <1151688531.626978.72410_at_y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>

Date: 30 Jun 2006 10:28:51 -0700

Message-ID: <1151688531.626978.72410_at_y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

> On 30 Jun 2006 09:39:29 -0700, Marshall wrote:

*>
**> > Given a set A, and a set B.
**> > Given a function f: A -> B
**> >
**> > We would not *necessarily* consider f as part of the definition of A.
**>
**> Absolutely. f is a part of definition of both.
**>
**> type <-> function is a relation. "Member" function is rubbish. BTW, when I
**> talk about multiple dispatch I do include results of functions. So, say
**>
**> + : A x B -> C
**>
**> is triple dispatching. It is an operation of types A, B, C.
*

Could you give an example of double dispatched function? Todether with a collection of objects where this function is applied upon? Received on Fri Jun 30 2006 - 19:28:51 CEST