Re: To Bob Badour, sorry

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 21 Jun 2006 05:38:19 -0700
Message-ID: <1150893499.948028.258680_at_m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>


Tony D wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
> [ Yes, I'm leaving this quoted piece of text in intentionally; and I'll
> keep it here in every reply on this thread. ]
>
> > > > You worthless piece of
> > > > well...nothingness-vaccum-filled-empty-shell...People like you die
> > > > totally forgotten by their family...
> > > >
> > >
> > > You really *are* a rather unpleasant example of humanity, aren't you ?
> > >
>
> Let's continue :
>
> > No on observed facts...
> >
> > For a few sentences, you have proved you are focusing subject on my
> > person again.
> >
>
> After the comment you made above, it's quite clear that you are
> focussing the subject on personalities.
>
> > Your are the one speaking of *unpleasant breed of humanity*. What's
> > next? an *inferior breed of humanity*?
> >
>
> Now that's quite astonishingly revisionist; I have said nothing about
> "breeds of humanity". I have said that *you*, as an *individual* are a
> vile example of humanity. For reference, the two sentences in question
> are :
>
> "You really *are* a rather unpleasant example of humanity, aren't you
> ?"
>
> and
>
> "No, you're just a rather vile example of humanity."
>
> I leave to a reader to decide for themselves if there were racial
> overtones or subtexts in either of those sentences. And I stand by both
> of them.
>
> > ...It's amazing how words say a lot about who people are....
> >
>
> I believe when I made exactly this point to you elsewhere in this very
> thread, you attempted to dismiss it as "hypocrisy" and "BS". So which
> is it Cimode ? Come on, this is yet another instance where you're going
> to have to come up to proof. You've singularly failed on that every
> time I have asked you a firm question on this thread.
Proofs are what you write...I have not used the term *breed of
humanity*..What is a *breed of humanity*? Show me a breed of humanity? If you think I am an unpleasant breed of humanity, who are the other member of that group? According to what objective criterias do you define them as members?

> > > Some reactions are of the knee-jerk, excessive and disgusting variety.
> > > And what exactly is a "copycon-personality-less-moron" ? Have you been
> > > at the dictionary again ?
> > I am positive you did get the point.
> >
>
> I'm still waiting for a definition of a
> "copycon-personality-less-moron", or is this just another question
> you're going to fail to answer.
Already answered that...See above for analysis of you attempts...

> > > > > Cheer up mate !
> > I am not your mate.
>
> "Be thankful for small mercies" was never more appropriate.
>
> > I do not want to establish a bond with you of any kind. I don't like
> > people like you. So stop talking diverting subject on me and focus on
> > data management subjects. You severely need it.
Point closed. I do not want to engage in any further person debate with you. Only data management... Received on Wed Jun 21 2006 - 14:38:19 CEST

Original text of this message