Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
Date: 20 Jun 2006 00:58:51 -0700
> It's just that it's a real shame you have so little *imagination* (a
> new word for your list)
It's just a shame you didn't realise I was mocking your lack of imagination in your phraseology, really. Maybe it was a little subtle for you ?
> that you must *paraphrase* a post I have made
> about BB's howling cats to illustrate their limited day to day
> vocabulary...(please give me your *cats dont' howl ethnocentric
> marshall like sermon)...
Look, "s/barking/howling/g; s/dogs/cats/g" doesn't count as imaginative additions to your limited lexicon, ok ? You really must try harder. If you must stick with "dogs", you could try "running dog lackey", with "fascist imperialists" following on in close attendance. That would open up a whole new vein of abusive terminology for you.
> I was right about you saying...You are
> probably the dummiest of all...You don't even deserve to be put on the
> FEW (Fraud Exposal Wall).
Awwwww.... never mind. Once I've answered your post on definitions of relations etc. you might revise that. And have you wikipedia'd the lambda calculus yet ?
> You worthless piece of
> well...nothingness-vaccum-filled-empty-shell...People like you die
> totally forgotten by their family...
You really *are* a rather unpleasant example of humanity, aren't you ?
Cheer up mate ! Received on Tue Jun 20 2006 - 09:58:51 CEST