Re: Rule engines

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 19 Jun 2006 11:42:00 -0700
Message-ID: <1150742520.115693.236200_at_p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>


Mikito Harakiri wrote:
> Marshall wrote:
> > Mikito Harakiri wrote:
> > > Also the fact that Datalog as a query
> > > language failed while SQL was a success is very telling.
> >
> > That's an intruiging statement. Would you care to expand on it?
> > What sorts of differences between them do you see as relevant,
> > and how might this have affected their market success?
>
> Perhaps neither of them is technologically superior to the point where
> it affect market success?

Do me a favor...
Do not engage that idiot with that kind of well thought argument...

He won't get it no matter how hard you try...

Somebody who thinks that there's a direct relationship between technology quality and market success is indeed delluding himself...

Induced his evidences about nonsense in the FEW (Fraud Exposal Wall)

Here check...(I like the Mathematics part) http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/browse_frm/thread/32908da39b71a373 Received on Mon Jun 19 2006 - 20:42:00 CEST

Original text of this message