You can pretty much bet that if it implements SQL, it's not an R-DBMS,
but it's an SQL-DBMS. The difference between relations and SQL tables
is something that gets chewed over a lot on this group. (On some
threads, you may want to get a fire-retardant suit ... ;)
Ovidiu.Silaghi wrote:
> My mistake! I was in a hurry and I wrote RDMBS instead of RDBMS..
> Relational DBMS products...
> What about SqlServer2000, can be consider as a RDBMS product?
>
> Thanks all!
> BB
Received on Mon Jun 19 2006 - 06:12:07 CDT
