Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour
Date: 18 Jun 2006 23:27:34 -0700
> Cimode wrote:
> > Please read and discuss only above...Discussing me has not interest to
> > this group///...
> > Tony D wrote:
> > > Ummm, I hate to point this out, but *how many* number 4s ? Can't you
> > > count ?
> > >
> > > I seem to hear someone being hoist by their own petard, somewhere ...
> Well, that's true. But then again, do we REALLY want to discuss the
> other 4/5 people either? I mean, obviously Cimode wants to, because he
> set up this thread.
The ony way I set up this thread is to expose some people and put their ignorance and incoherence about RM concepts by proving their nonsense to large audiences...I do not really car about who they are but about the nonsense the state.
> I propose to hijack the thread into a long and boring off-topic
> discussion of all the possible things Cimode might have wrong with him.
> And flames, Flames, FLAMES!
If actually interested with *FLAMES*, most of them will be posted by the ignorants in the threads where they will expose their nonsense...This is just a wall where I gather nice quote of theirs...; Don't worry the flames will be present in the other threads
> On the other hand, maybe I should just trunc
Received on Mon Jun 19 2006 - 08:27:34 CEST