Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank

Re: OT: Troll vs. Crank

From: Pickie <keith.johnson_at_datacom.co.nz>
Date: 18 Jun 2006 18:15:46 -0700
Message-ID: <1150679746.353460.74700@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>

Cimode wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
> > Cimode wrote:
> >
> > > mAsterdam wrote:
> > >>His current content/insult ratio is somewhere near BB's.
> > >
> > > Is this how you discuss RM theory an data management...
> >
> > No, the way it goes lately every potential discussion
> > is smashed in the egg.
> One clever thought...
>
> That's the results of BB' idiots group always diverting issues on
> people rather than ideas...
> People have to react on that and expose all this crappola...The entire
> thread was almost exclusively focused on me...I begin feeling
> honored...
>
> > BTW: Please don't quote the whole post for just one line
> > of new content.
> Thanks for the tip...check out the new threads...
> It should clarify some things to people...Let's see how BB's barking
> dogs know how to discuss issues...

I'm really impressed how quickly you picked up that the thread was aimed at you. Is it possible that Marshall was justified?

In the thread "Little question for RDM theoristes" you said (in response to a statement by J M Davitt) "What a stupid idiotic statement!!!". A couple of posts later you said "And you got the nerve calling me an idiot!!". Since he had quoted your own post, you responded to yourself, _misinterpreting_ your own statement to mean that you had called yourself an idiot.

Another meaning of "cranky" is bad-tempered - you qualify on those grounds, anyway. Received on Sun Jun 18 2006 - 20:15:46 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US