Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: terminology

Re: terminology

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 18 Jun 2006 15:35:39 -0700
Message-ID: <1150670139.755220.12640@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>


paul c just pointed out to you some incoherences in your understanding of RM...Do not get mad at him...

paul c wrote:
> Marshall wrote:
> > paul c wrote:
> >>...
> > Certainly there are different contexts in which the term "variable"
> > is used, and across those different contexts there may be
> > incompatible meanings. I was speaking of the programming
> > languages theory ("PLT") context. So I am speaking of regular
> > data variables, rather than logic variables--they are quite
> > different.
> > ...
>
> Okay, not trying to give you a hard time, as I liked the economical
> phrasing, it was just that the start of the original msg mentioned "in
> the c.d.t. context" and i feel a conventional programming language must
> be a mere servant of that.
>
> p
>
> ps yes, that's what i meant by fopl and rt (i feel rt is a slightly more
> foregiving term than rm).
Received on Sun Jun 18 2006 - 17:35:39 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US