Re: Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL
From: Tony D <tonyisyourpal_at_netscape.net>
Date: 17 Jun 2006 15:24:16 -0700
Message-ID: <1150583056.895661.325850_at_p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
Date: 17 Jun 2006 15:24:16 -0700
Message-ID: <1150583056.895661.325850_at_p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
I took this as Marshall heading towards the difference between a concrete literal and the abstract value denoted by the literal. For example, "3", "three", "III", "drei" and "trois" are all literals that denote the value 3. Can you say what the problem with this idea is and provide a pointer to a more correct interpretation ? Received on Sun Jun 18 2006 - 00:24:16 CEST