Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: To Bob Badour, sorry

Re: To Bob Badour, sorry

From: Tony D <tonyisyourpal_at_netscape.net>
Date: 17 Jun 2006 14:46:34 -0700
Message-ID: <1150580794.682346.173740@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Cimode wrote:
> Among the people I spoke to to day you are probably the dummiest...Just
> can't make sense of anything...A real time haven...I won't even bother
> with you...Some p

This is a bit of a trait of your posts; sentences appear to start then disappear into nothingness. "Some p..." what ?

> LOL
>

Glad you found it funny.

> More crappola

No, just pointing out your boorishness... oh wait, you did that for yourself, didn't you ?

> You are the one bringing irrelevant subject about me...and you got the
> nerve state I don't discuss RM...
>

Go on - point to a post *on this thread* where you discuss anything *at all* about the relational model, rather than the mental acuity or personality of those who disagree with you. Go on.

> No..You should be ashamed of yourself...
>

If I *had* actually insulted anyone, I would be. Since I haven't, I'm not.

> My writing is unuseful because you cant' read and make sense out of
> simple ideas...You are mentally impaired I am afraid...
>

I can't make a lot of sense of your garbled meanderings. So yes, your writing is "unuseful" (sic). As for my level of mental impairment, I think, given your other posts in this and other threads, you really aren't in a fit state to judge on that.

> Thanks god I was the one denouncing them wit most force on this thread...Gives me some
> hope something triggered in your puny mind...

Actually, I was writing about the last sentence in your post, and dismissing you as attempting a patronising paternalistic tone. You really ought to read these things more carefully you know.

Oh, and by the way, I had a spare half hour and read over the thread you pointed me to before. And I can report that :

  1. It was at least as, if not even more, uninteresting and irrelevant to me as I thought. As I mentioned before, I have somewhere between little and no time for either OO or thinking about physical representations, in memory or elsewhere. And at least at the start, you did get hopelessly confused between logical and physical - or if you weren't, you were so unable to express yourself you portrayed a confused mind. Still, at least you've broken through the language barrier enough to bandy about terms like "BS", "mentally impaired", "hypocrisy" and so on.
  2. You *did* get burned off - at least, being told to go fuck yourself counts as being burned off as far as I'm concerned.
  3. You conducted yourself with all the charm, tact and subtle wit you've displayed on this thread too.

Can I be one of your frauds now please ? Oh go on, you know you want to ... Received on Sat Jun 17 2006 - 16:46:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US