Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
Date: 17 Jun 2006 13:33:18 -0700
Among the people I spoke to to day you are probably the dummiest...Just
can't make sense of anything...A real time haven...I won't even bother
with you...Some p
Tony D wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
> > Tony D a écrit :
> > Simple...
> > My opinion of BB is based on facts and statement made about RM
> > issues..Your opinion (that I don't give a damn about) relies
> > exclusively on my character not any facts I stated about RM...
> > I have given enough time to you. If you still do not understand...I am
> > sincerely begining to believ you are in fact menatlly impaired...Sorry
> > but I ca not do more for you...
> Because all you have offered *on this thread* is a variety of insults
> towards Bob, those who agree with Bob, and anyone who doesn't agree
> with you. I thought this might be a bit lacking in terms of source
> material, so I visited another recent thread in which you have
> participated that may have been of some interest than the OO stuff you
> pointed me to before: "Little Question for RDM Theoristes". Your
> handling of JM Davitt there was as bad as anything Bob has handed out
> (although I don't recall Bob ever accusing someone of calling him an
> idiot out of nowhere, as you did with Davitt). You assumed a position,
> did not enunciate that position particularly clearly and rebuked in a
> variety of ways those who disagreed with you. That, sir, makes you
> guilty of precisely the behaviour you criticise another for. There's a
> word for people who behave that way - it might even start with an 'h'
> > Next time on a technical thread please/ Observe and see...
> > > So far, I don't think I have insulted you too much, if at all really.
> > *insulted you too much* So? What's next? insult levels?
> Yes; some language and terms are more insulting than others. If I say,
> "you're being silly," that's one thing. If I say "you're being a
> cloth-eared idiot," that's another. If I say "you're a clueless moron,"
> that's something else again. If I say "you're a hypocritical mental
> deficient," that's on quite another plane of insult.
> > ...Let me tell you this...
> Ooh, I'm all rapt attention now... (if I was standing up, I would have
> clicked my heels there...)
> > By diverting right away on my person instead of my RM related
> > statements, you have insulted me but not only me..
> And as I said before, you haven't said anything about RM **on this
> thread**; all you've done so far is accuse others of BS, hypocrisy,
> mental deficiency, etc etc etc.
You are the one bringing irrelevant subject about me...and you got the nerve state I don't discuss RM...
> > You have insulted the
> > motivation of several people who seek knowledge rather intent
> > trials...You have insulted all people who believe in REASON rather
> > BELIEF...
> Have I really ? That's a lot of people. If I had known I was insulting
> that many people I would have expended some effort on it.
No..You should be ashamed of yourself...
> > I would write down books about it, you would still not understand...
> Depends how good you are at writing.
My writing is unuseful because you cant' read and make sense out of simple ideas...You are mentally impaired I am afraid...
> > You are a lost cause I am afraid...
> Oooh, look ! Patronising paternalism to go with the insults, invective
> and hypocrisy ! Thanks god I was the one denouncing them wit most force on this thread...Gives me some hope something triggered in your puny mind...
Received on Sat Jun 17 2006 - 22:33:18 CEST