Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
Date: 17 Jun 2006 07:02:40 -0700
Tony D a écrit :
> Cimode wrote:
> > Tony D wrote:
> > > Cimode wrote:
> > > > Tony D wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Oh but you are. More than it appears you could ever possibly realise.
> > > > OK. Prove it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > > > So pointing out that you're boorish makes it acceptable somehow ? Does
> > > > > that charm school you went to have lots of pupils ?
> > > >
> > > > I am not talking about myself..Are you mentally impaired? Don't you
> > > > know how to read?
> > >
> > > By our choice of language, words and tone, we let people know more
> > > about how we view the world and the people in it than we'd often care
> > > to admit. In your posts on this thread, you have accused people of
> > > talking BS, of hypocrisy, called them barking dogs, accused them of
> > > being infatuated with Bob Badour, amongst a variety of other things,
> > > and in this post you question whether I am mentally impaired. All
> > > because I think your somewhat splenetic responses to posts on this
> > > thread are at complete odds with your distaste for Bob Badour's
> > > language in dealing with other people.
> > Not just language but incoherence and hypocrisy...
> > > Now, given the language, words and tone you have chosen to use in this
> > > thread, what sort of person do you think you have announced yourself as
> > > ?
> > The language used is plain english and is not directly adressed to
> > anybody in particular except to BB and 2 or 3 others...Anybody who
> > recognizes himself in the definitions I have exposed and the situations
> > and incoherences I have explained and pointed out should draw his own
> > conclusions...
> > When I ask you if you are mentally impaired, it is a legitimate
> > question considering the unfounded or irrelevant statements you are
> > continuously making...
> You didn't answer the question. What sort of opinion do you think I am
> forming of you, based on the way you are conducting yourself in this
> thread ? Do you think the opinion I am forming of you is that much
> different to the one you seem to have quickly formed of Bob ?
My opinion of BB is based on facts and statement made about RM issues..Your opinion (that I don't give a damn about) relies exclusively on my character not any facts I stated about RM... I have given enough time to you. If you still do not understand...I am sincerely begining to believ you are in fact menatlly impaired...Sorry but I ca not do more for you...
> Nope, I'm not hurt. Thank you for your concern though (however
> insincere it may be).
>> > reasonning you got to pay consequences...
> > If you engage in
> > public debate ready to accuse people and insult them without sound
> > Another proof of hypocrisy...
> So far, I don't think I have insulted you too much, if at all really.
*insulted you too much* So? What's next? insult levels? ...Let me tell you this...
By diverting right away on my person instead of my RM related
statements, you have insulted me but not only me..You have insulted the
motivation of several people who seek knowledge rather intent
trials...You have insulted all people who believe in REASON rather
> (A joke, involving the French guard in Monty Python & the Holy Grail
> has just sprung to mind.) I have taken issue with your one-sided
> reinterpretation of others posts, your immoderate tone and your
> occasional descent into incomprehensiblity. Would you care to outline
> the proof of hypocrisy you have found so far ?
I would write down books about it, you would still not understand...You are a lost cause I am afraid... Received on Sat Jun 17 2006 - 16:02:40 CEST