Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
Date: 17 Jun 2006 06:44:29 -0700
> Tony D wrote:
> > Cimode wrote:
> > > Tony D wrote:
> > > > Oh but you are. More than it appears you could ever possibly realise.
> > > OK. Prove it.
> > >
> > > > So pointing out that you're boorish makes it acceptable somehow ? Does
> > > > that charm school you went to have lots of pupils ?
> > >
> > > I am not talking about myself..Are you mentally impaired? Don't you
> > > know how to read?
> > By our choice of language, words and tone, we let people know more
> > about how we view the world and the people in it than we'd often care
> > to admit. In your posts on this thread, you have accused people of
> > talking BS, of hypocrisy, called them barking dogs, accused them of
> > being infatuated with Bob Badour, amongst a variety of other things,
> > and in this post you question whether I am mentally impaired. All
> > because I think your somewhat splenetic responses to posts on this
> > thread are at complete odds with your distaste for Bob Badour's
> > language in dealing with other people.
> Not just language but incoherence and hypocrisy...
> > Now, given the language, words and tone you have chosen to use in this
> > thread, what sort of person do you think you have announced yourself as
> > ?
> The language used is plain english and is not directly adressed to
> anybody in particular except to BB and 2 or 3 others...Anybody who
> recognizes himself in the definitions I have exposed and the situations
> and incoherences I have explained and pointed out should draw his own
> When I ask you if you are mentally impaired, it is a legitimate
> question considering the unfounded or irrelevant statements you are
> continuously making...
You didn't answer the question. What sort of opinion do you think I am forming of you, based on the way you are conducting yourself in this thread ? Do you think the opinion I am forming of you is that much different to the one you seem to have quickly formed of Bob ?
> If you engage in
> public debate ready to accuse people and insult them without sound
> reasonning you got to pay consequences...
> Another proof of hypocrisy...
So far, I don't think I have insulted you too much, if at all really. (A joke, involving the French guard in Monty Python & the Holy Grail has just sprung to mind.) I have taken issue with your one-sided reinterpretation of others posts, your immoderate tone and your occasional descent into incomprehensiblity. Would you care to outline the proof of hypocrisy you have found so far ? Received on Sat Jun 17 2006 - 15:44:29 CEST