Re: To Bob Badour, sorry

From: Cimode <>
Date: 17 Jun 2006 05:56:03 -0700
Message-ID: <>

Tony D a écrit :

> Cimode wrote:
> > You doubled up 3 don't you know how to count?
> >
> Oh dear. I didn't change a numbering when I added a point. Dear oh
> dear. Well, that makes the whole thing invalid then, I suppose ?
> > 1 - YES and I have not been proven wrong
> > 2 - It is a conclusion based on facts observed on this thread AND other
> > 3 - YES..
> > 3- NO...I perceive the poster as a victim...I said you and others are
> > full of crappola
> > 4- YES I urge him to ignore the crappola comments posted and make up
> > his own mind reading and documenting himself rather than listen to
> > barking dogs...
> > 5- 6 I did NOT attribute the BS to the poster but to people like you
> > and other barking dogs..I see Rich Ryan as a victim of your delluded
> > spirit...
> >
> Maybe if you read what I had written a little more closely rather than
> taking your customary, it seems, knee-jerk reaction to disagreement,
> you would note that I wrote "poster", not "original poster" or "OP". My
> comments were with regard to your post to Roy Hann. Pay attention.
Misunderstood..But took time responding to your insults...

> > Check
> >
> >
> > for further details...
> No, I don't think I will; I saw the title of that thread and decided it
> was likely of little interest;
I pointed out that link to answer your question... That says a lot about how superficial you can actually make an entire idea about a subject through reading a title and without readining the content of thread
if you really want to you can check my
> previous history of posts for my attitude to object oriented
> programming. I'm open to changing my opinion, but as time goes by the
> chances of my opinion on OO changing are decreasing. And if someone is
> going to change my opinion, it probably won't be via an internet
> newsgroup.
I am not an OO advocate but if you would have taken the time to read the issue at hand it was about just about OO mechanisms but also how ANY programming or physical mechanism could help better relvar at physical level...Your knowledge of RM must be as superficial as your ability and motivation to get into technical and theoretical exchanges.... Received on Sat Jun 17 2006 - 14:56:03 CEST

Original text of this message