Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
Date: 17 Jun 2006 05:47:05 -0700
Tony D wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
> > What an empty accusation...I have observed this board for several weeks
> > no and I saw BB's behavior I have tasted myself...Either people are
> > infatuated with this guy or they just think he's sick.
> Thank you for taking the time to conduct a thorough, in-depth analysis
> of the motivations, views, thoughts and opinions of those who post in
> this group. Not.
> > A lot of what?
> > A lot of BS....From what I observed he brings mainly disrespect,
> > insults and close mindedness...His attitude makes this board a sterile
> > field of eternal "OO VS RM people"
> > and "you are saying nonsense"
> Sometimes, you just have to call a spade a spade. Sometimes admittedly
> Bob will call it a bloody spade, and get rather exasperated that
> someone still hasn't grasped the concept of "spadeness"
How practical...Sticking etiquettes to people is very practical when you can't disqualify their arguments...Well sir let me tell you that RM science is not practical..it's about efforts observing, advancing carefully weighting and being sincere with yourself... Nothing demonstrated so far by BB brings to anything else that he lacks coherence and knowledge...
When people focus onto more onto sticking people's foreheads than discuss their ideas that proves a point...They are pure premium quality BS burried...
> talk lots and lots about how they want to rename shovels as spades and
> can't see what the problem with that is and hey I've been successful
> with projects by using shovels and calling them spades and I've been
> earning decent money since nineteen-canteen using shovels as spades and
> the difference between a shovel and a spade is only of interest to
> those theory guys and ... and .. and ...
Damn here comes the money bragging...
> > I have confronted him with simple arguments he did not even
> > understand...I had to reexplain a thousand times to receive insults...
> Maybe he understood them better than you think ?
> > If you advocate "jumping on people" is the best way to handle KOTM
> > people, you are delluding yourself...
> > KOTM have a life...All you gain from *jumping on them* is either *rough
> > charm infatuation* or *disgust*...Neither infatuation nor *disgust*
> > help people exchange ideas in a productive..
> It entirely depends on the method of engagement. If someone turns up
> asking an honest question, looking for honest answers, they generally
> get them. If someone turns up asking leading questions or pushing an
> opinion or pursuing an agenda whilst simultaneously repeating over and
> over that they're just asking questions and would like to understand,
> well they can expect to get called on that. Reasonably enough. And if
> it goes on over an extended period, anyone's patience wears out.
> Even though his phraseology may occasionally make me wince, I view many
> of Bob's postings with a "he says these things so we don't have to"
I state he and some are full of BS...Somebody who defines a mathematical axiom as a boolean function is full of crap. He and some others just lack he fundamental mathematical knowledge...What pisses me off is their contemptous attitude thinking they can understand RM through SQL...
> > Stupid questions trigger stupid responses...
> And I'll say that again :
> And in the context of this whole stream of postings, I'll say it again
That's what happens when somebody lacks argument and vocabulary, he/she first uses prepackaged practical concepts he/she heard on a specific thread...At the end, he can not use anything else than symbols...I bet if we were face to face you would be growning (you know like neanderthalians men)....A beautiful example of barbarian and uneducated attitude... Received on Sat Jun 17 2006 - 14:47:05 CEST