Re: To Bob Badour, sorry

Cimode wrote:
> You doubled up 3 don't you know how to count?
>

Oh dear. I didn't change a numbering when I added a point. Dear oh dear. Well, that makes the whole thing invalid then, I suppose ?

> 1 - YES and I have not been proven wrong
> 2 - It is a conclusion based on facts observed on this thread AND other
> 3 - YES..
> 3- NO...I perceive the poster as a victim...I said you and others are
> full of crappola
> 4- YES I urge him to ignore the crappola comments posted and make up
> his own mind reading and documenting himself rather than listen to
> barking dogs...
> 5- 6 I did NOT attribute the BS to the poster but to people like you
> and other barking dogs..I see Rich Ryan as a victim of your delluded
> spirit...
>

Maybe if you read what I had written a little more closely rather than taking your customary, it seems, knee-jerk reaction to disagreement, you would note that I wrote "poster", not "original poster" or "OP". My comments were with regard to your post to Roy Hann. Pay attention.

> Check
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/browse_frm/thread/54e82593b205a2a8
>
> for further details...

No, I don't think I will; I saw the title of that thread and decided it was likely of little interest; if you really want to you can check my previous history of posts for my attitude to object oriented programming. I'm open to changing my opinion, but as time goes by the chances of my opinion on OO changing are decreasing. And if someone is going to change my opinion, it probably won't be via an internet newsgroup. Received on Sat Jun 17 2006 - 14:31:00 CEST