Re: To Bob Badour, sorry

From: Cimode <>
Date: 17 Jun 2006 04:25:54 -0700
Message-ID: <>

x wrote:
> "Tony D" <> wrote in message
> >
> > Cimode wrote:
> > > What an empty accusation...I have observed this board for several weeks
> > > no and I saw BB's behavior I have tasted myself...Either people are
> > > infatuated with this guy or they just think he's sick.
> > >
> > Thank you for taking the time to conduct a thorough, in-depth analysis
> > of the motivations, views, thoughts and opinions of those who post in
> > this group. Not.
One experiment or 2 experiments are enough to conclude...No need to spend years talking about that...insults, BS and incoherence does not require in depth analysis...OTOH, discussing areas that have not been sufficiently addressed requires effort, coherence and humility...BB and his barking dogs lack both...

> Huh !?!? A reaction or a retraction ?
This is railroad station phylosophy..Don't forget to bring your Reader Digest next time...

> > > A lot of what?
> > > A lot of BS....From what I observed he brings mainly disrespect,
> > > insults and close mindedness...His attitude makes this board a sterile
> > > field of eternal "OO VS RM people"
> > > and "you are saying nonsense"
> > Sometimes, you just have to call a spade a spade.
You have to be careful with such concept...Some people may use it to disqualify anything that proves them wrong...

> And often not.
> Who's pushing you to do that ? :-)
To do what? To denounce the hyppocrisy and ignorance of some people here...

> Where I have heard that before ? ...
Of course you have heard it before...It's just your ears are filled up with SQL crappola to hear it...

> >Sometimes admittedly
> > Bob will call it a bloody spade, and get rather exasperated that
> > someone still hasn't grasped the concept of "spadeness" and wants to
> > talk lots and lots about how they want to rename shovels as spades and
> > can't see what the problem with that is and hey I've been successful
> > with projects by using shovels and calling them spades and I've been
> > earning decent money since nineteen-canteen using shovels as spades and
> > the difference between a shovel and a spade is only of interest to
> > those theory guys and ... and .. and ...
A confused reasonning...
BB insults (due to a lack of good manners) is not the worse part of the debate...His incoherence and hyppocrisy is...He pretends one thing (like educate you, help you) and in the next thread he insults you which means he lacks coherence...I observe that and I do not need to put a word on it (spade BS)...I describe a situation I observe period...

> Maybe they were just talking about different things ...
BS, I have used terms, defined terms reexplained terms again and again..Some people get it right away but certainly not paradign blinded idiots

> > > I have confronted him with simple arguments he did not even
> > > understand...I had to reexplain a thousand times to receive insults...
> > Maybe he understood them better than you think ?
That was my initial thought but I was wrong... I reread the entire thread and presented him with documented and succint ways of proving that some allegation he made were irrelevant and wrong...No answer...Therefore, I draw a conclusion...

> Or maybe not, 'cause he has not shown that.
> 0x2B | 0x2B that's the question.
> > > If you advocate "jumping on people" is the best way to handle KOTM
> > > people, you are delluding yourself...
> > > KOTM have a life...All you gain from *jumping on them* is either *rough
> > > charm infatuation* or *disgust*...Neither infatuation nor *disgust*
> > > help people exchange ideas in a productive..
> > It entirely depends on the method of engagement. If someone turns up
> > asking an honest question, looking for honest answers, they generally
> > get them.
BS science does not rely on etiquette or form..It relies on proofs, facts and sound reasonning...You are trying to defend the undefendable...Speaking of *method of engagement*, do you truly think that insults is a nice *method of enagement*...I do not really give a damn about etiquette but I do give a damn about data management science that SQL reasonning keeps continuously burrying day after day...

> If someone turns up it will be turned down.
> Garcon! Another turn!
> >If someone turns up asking leading questions
> What's a leading question ? A heavy one ?
> >or pushing an
> > opinion or pursuing an agenda whilst simultaneously repeating over and
> > over that they're just asking questions and would like to understand,
> > well they can expect to get called on that. Reasonably enough. And if
> > it goes on over an extended period, anyone's patience wears out.
> Who's agenda ?

You better stick to jokes...Seems you are better at it than RM and data management ;) Received on Sat Jun 17 2006 - 13:25:54 CEST

Original text of this message