Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
Date: 17 Jun 2006 03:33:24 -0700
Tony D wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
> > No. My observation of simple facts. I have proved by subjecting clear
> > proofs that some people had totally incoherent behaviors, claiming one
> > thing doing something opposite...I brought obvious examples and
> > questions about RAM memory to a so called knowledgeable audience who
> > chose to ignore the issues diqualifying them as nonsense and insulting
> > me.
> At last ! The crux of the issue ! Bob (and/or others possibly) burned
> you off when you brought along a question of possibly dubious
> relevance, and now you're throwing a hissy fit. Boo hoo.
You base your statement on BELIEF rather than REASON... You have not even read the thread...
> > You are just too buried in BS to see it...
> Nope, no BS around here. Or was that metaphorical ? Rhetorical, maybe ?
> > >From what I heard from some ignorants about mathematics and its
> > supposed application to RM just makes me think this NG is full of
> > crappola who really are delluding themselves...Even worse, they have a
> > contemptuous self congratulating attitude and hyppocrisy that sickens
> > me...Thanks god a few have had the spirit into bringing some fresh
> > ideas into this space...
> Another fine example of the kind of well reasoned, mannered,
> sophisticated debate you'd like to introduce, presumably.
It is an simple observation of facts and interaction with some people among which BB...
I do not insult people, I do not run away when they adress or challenge me...I may just say I am wrong WHEN somebody proves me wrong...I just get sick of contemptuous attitude...
> > Who are the others? Infatuated idiots who don't have a clue of the
> > concepts they try to handle...
> The toys are flying out of the pram now... FWIW, I'm not infatuated
> with Bob. Hell, he hasn't even taken me out for dinner, never mind a
> proper date or anything.
I am talking about intellectual infatuation Duhhh...You truly are convinced he is a knowldegeable source of information while he lacks 2 fundamental qualities for that: coherence in his acts and statement and fundamental education about mathematics to understand better RM....
> > *saving us*? He is no fucking Christ!!!
I have never had any experience with sects..For your knowledge I am
> > I don't know why some people have this obssessional need to be saved!!
> Where did you get "obsessional" from in what Gene wrote ? Maybe you
> should spend more time concentrating on the text rather than trying to
> read between the lines ?
> > If you want to save yourself, open a book read and do your best to
> > understand...
> > ...You talk about him as a sect guru leader..
> Never having been in a sect, I'll bow to your presumably better
> experience and knowledge of such things.
I used a sect as an analogy to compare the behavior and exchanging style with some people. I observed, read responses and draw conclusions...That's all there's to it...
I have never had any experience with sects..For your knowledge I am agnostic.
> > This post indicates you truly are too infatuated with BB to be
> > objective...
> > BB and lots of people that follow him like dogs just lack fundamental
> > knowledge on what constitute the source of RM: Mathematics...They do
> > not know shit about what an Axiom is... what scientifical methodology
> > is but portray themselves as sources of information...That says a lot
> > about the current level of data management and science in this
> > NG...Instead of compensating their ignorance by hard work in learning
> > they prefer pre-packaged ways of dealing with opposite ideas..How
> > practical?
> I think your spleen got the better of you there, because that paragraph
> just degenerated into gibberish to me. Not that it had much
> degeneration to do, mind.
Yeah easy to disqualify people using concepts such as *spleen*...I bet you don't even know the meaning of this term...How practical... Received on Sat Jun 17 2006 - 12:33:24 CEST