Re: Little question for RDM theoristes
From: Erwin <e.smout_at_myonline.be>
Date: 16 Jun 2006 05:41:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1150461709.272018.110430_at_h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Date: 16 Jun 2006 05:41:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1150461709.272018.110430_at_h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
> Your question implies relations = relvalues...which if I follow this
> false premise reasonning would lead to relations that have similar
> relvalues being equal which is totally false...2 relvar with same
> relvalues are NOT necessarily equal.
> This question is totally irrelevant if you consider a relation as being
> equal to a relvalue...
This question is not irrelevant at all since the heading is regarded as the definition of the applicable relation type. And for values to be equal, they must most certainly be of the exact same type, inheritance issues notwithstanding of course. Received on Fri Jun 16 2006 - 14:41:50 CEST