Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
Date: 15 Jun 2006 15:46:20 -0700
Message-ID: <1150411580.764442.29730_at_f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Cimode wrote:
> Yes it is different. Totally different, because it demonstrates a
> totally different motivation on your part.
>
> Your intention is clearly to dismiss BB's responsability into provoking
> guilt with Rich Ryan. Instead, you favor of saying Rich Ryan is not
> the one living to his own's standard and add more guilt...
>
> You give it a smooth look-and-feel wax but when you look at the facts
> and only facts it quickly appears all you have said is pure crapola...
>
> Besides, if you believe that what I said is not different from what you
> said then you should agree to it...and stop the BS. The victim here is
> not BB it's Rich Ryan...
>
In the context of this thread at least, you're coming over as a fount of boundless charm and grace yourself. Let's look at this post, shall we ?
- You have ascribed a motivation to someone else's post.
- You have supplied your own interpretation of that post, based on your own viewpoint and agenda.
- You accuse the poster of attempting to induce guilt in Rich Ryan.
- You accuse the poster of being a charming purveyor of "crapola".
- You demand a course of action from the poster.
- You order the poster to "stop the BS".
- You ascribe victimhood to Rich Ryan.
Quite how all this squares with your apparent views about Bob Badour isn't immediately apparent to me. Received on Fri Jun 16 2006 - 00:46:20 CEST