Re: Lets get physical

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 02:19:18 GMT
Message-ID: <Gyokg.1077$Zk3.25442@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

J M Davitt wrote:

> Cimode wrote:
>

>> Are you mentally impaired?
>>
>> I have posted specific sentences from FP totally negating your initial
>> statement that FP would have advocated that TRM is not physical...

>
>
> Quoting directly from the URI you posted,
>
> TRM is at a lower level than the relational model (RM),
> it is nevertheless a model, and not a physical implementation.
>
> So, I'm confused: how is it that you assert paulc is incorrect when
> saying that TRM is not physical?

In my defense, when I conclude people are mentally impaired, the idiots have given ample evidence to support the conclusion. Received on Thu Jun 15 2006 - 21:19:18 CDT