Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model

Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model

From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 01:14:59 GMT
Message-ID: <nCnkg.36044$iF6.10516@pd7tw2no>


Bob Badour wrote:

> paul c wrote:
> 

>> Cimode wrote:
>>
>>> paul c a écrit :
>>>
>>> The basic premise of this thread was to suggest that physical issues
>>> may restrict faithfull representation of relvars and asking the
>>> question on whether OO mechanisms could help ...
>>
>> If so, the thread should restrict itself to relvars and OO mechanisms
>> (e.g., inheritance).
>>
>>> ... representation through N-ary physical scheme)...If I am not
>>> mistaken a
>>> non-sequiturs involve false premice. ...
>>
>> I'd say you are mistaken, so 'not mistaken' is a false premise.
>
> Non sequitur does not require a false premise. ...

That's why he is mistaken.

p Received on Thu Jun 15 2006 - 20:14:59 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US