Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Lets get physical

Re: Lets get physical

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:36:50 GMT
Message-ID: <C2nkg.1028$Zk3.23994@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>


paul c wrote:

> Cimode wrote:
> 

>> paul c wrote:
>>
>>> J M Davitt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cimode wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> paul c wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Like some others here (as best as I can recall), I've puzzled over
>>>>>> comments such as the TRM not being a physical layer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody who stated has not a clue about RM...What a stupid
>>>>> comment...who advocated that? I certainly did'nt...
>>>>> ...
>>>
>>> FP, I think. Might find it at dbdebunk.com. Not sure about CJ Date.
>>
>> If you consider that FP and CJ Date think that TRM is not anything else
>> than an implementation model for RM working on physical layer of
>> representation you are delluding yourself. TRM defines clearly
>> physical oriented concepts...

I may be deluding myself, but I had a little help... from Fabian. In private correspondence, he very briefly described TRM as an abstract implementation model that would lie between the logical relational model and the physical media. I don't pretend to know or understand anything about TRM. Received on Thu Jun 15 2006 - 19:36:50 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US