paul c wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
>
>> paul c wrote:
>>
>>> J M Davitt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cimode wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> paul c wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Like some others here (as best as I can recall), I've puzzled over
>>>>>> comments such as the TRM not being a physical layer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody who stated has not a clue about RM...What a stupid
>>>>> comment...who advocated that? I certainly did'nt...
>>>>> ...
>>>
>>> FP, I think. Might find it at dbdebunk.com. Not sure about CJ Date.
>>
>> If you consider that FP and CJ Date think that TRM is not anything else
>> than an implementation model for RM working on physical layer of
>> representation you are delluding yourself. TRM defines clearly
>> physical oriented concepts...
I may be deluding myself, but I had a little help... from Fabian. In
private correspondence, he very briefly described TRM as an abstract
implementation model that would lie between the logical relational model
and the physical media. I don't pretend to know or understand anything
about TRM.
Received on Thu Jun 15 2006 - 19:36:50 CDT
