Re: Lets get physical

From: paul c <>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:13:15 GMT
Message-ID: <L3kkg.35766$IK3.1433_at_pd7tw1no>

J M Davitt wrote:

> Cimode wrote:

>> paul c wrote:
>>> Like some others here (as best as I can recall), I've puzzled over
>>> comments such as the TRM not being a physical layer.
>> Anybody who stated has not a clue about RM...What a stupid
>> comment...who advocated that? I certainly did'nt...
>> ...

Nobody said you did. If it was stated before you were born, you couldn't have. That seems the most likely reason to me.

p Received on Thu Jun 15 2006 - 23:13:15 CEST

Original text of this message