Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
Date: 15 Jun 2006 08:08:29 -0700
BS...No need to look for a complex patronizing interpretation of
He's simply apologizing because he had an epidermic response toward BB
way of handling people and has bad conscience about that.
He's simply apologizing because he had an epidermic response toward BB way of handling people and has bad conscience about that.
His initial sentence is
<<I was mad and I called him names.>>
The reason he does apologizes is because BB and some people on this board made him feel guilty about what he should *not* feel guilty about...He should not feel guilty of not knowing something his accusators don't have a clue about...
It's all crap...He should not apologize to anybody here and certainly not to BB...
Roy Hann wrote:
> "Cimode" <cimode_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > You do not have to apologize to anybody about not knowing and certainly
> > not to BB...If you called BB names he probably deserved it.
> He wasn't apologizing for "not knowing". He was probably apologizing
> because he felt he hadn't lived up to his own standards. If so, I rather
> admire that.
Received on Thu Jun 15 2006 - 17:08:29 CEST