Re: Foreign key problem
From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:33:19 +0300
Message-ID: <e6rjr9$j4r$1_at_nntp.aioe.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:33:19 +0300
Message-ID: <e6rjr9$j4r$1_at_nntp.aioe.org>
> Hmm. A _name_ /would/ be necessary to permit your example..
> But what is the meaning of the overlapping constraints
> with different names?
Overlapping as in the example, or overlapping as identical ?
How about this:
t1(a,b)
(a,b) references (c,d)
t2(c,d)