Re: A better SQL implementation?
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:16:06 GMT
Message-ID: <Gofig.120$Mn5.68_at_pd7tw3no>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:16:06 GMT
Message-ID: <Gofig.120$Mn5.68_at_pd7tw3no>
David Cressey wrote:
> ...
> DEC Rdb/VMS engineers were NOT overly obsessed with seek times and
> rotational latencies. If anything, Rdb databases tended to get slowed down
> by letting the disks they resided on get fragmented,
> ...
Same problem, really.
p Received on Fri Jun 09 2006 - 16:16:06 CEST