Re: OT fallacies
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:43:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4484972b$0$31643$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Please do not misattribute your writings to me.
Patrick May wrote:
>>> I did not find him backing up his claims regarding >>>Mr. Martin's "foolishness". Can you or can you not point out a >>>specific example of him doing so? >> >>>Robert Martin ha escrito: >>>Ridiculous. OO and RDB coexist very nicely together. I've never >>>heard anyone suggest that searches aren't needed. >> >>Relational databases have nothing to do with searches. This shows >>profound ignorance about data management theory.
>
>
> For the record, Mr. Martin was responding to the following:
>
>
>>Many OO evangelists claim that searches are not needed in well >>design OO applications. You have to redesign your application to >>avoid the scenario above. Obviously reporting, etc, should not be >>done using OOA/D.
Which, in turn, was in response to the OP,
which included this remark:
> ************************
>
> In the database world, this is a simple join across two tables.
>
> *************************
Patrick May wrote:
> In this context,
The context is - at least - all of the thread leading up to the claims and all subsequent posts by both posters.
See below.
> neither of Mr. Martin's statements are prima facie
> foolish. More importantly, Mr. Novoa's response does not demonstrate
> any foolishness on Mr. Martin's part.
YMMV Context available at
so those who want to form an opinion on whether any foolishness was demonstrated can judge for themselves.
[snip hypothesis] Received on Mon Jun 05 2006 - 22:43:28 CEST