Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model
From: J M Davitt <jdavitt_at_aeneas.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 20:36:28 GMT
Message-ID: <gpmgg.47066$mh.40616_at_tornado.ohiordc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 20:36:28 GMT
Message-ID: <gpmgg.47066$mh.40616_at_tornado.ohiordc.rr.com>
Cimode wrote:
> <<I am not certain I agree with that last sentence.>>Can you ellaborate
> on that? What
> do you have in mind?
>
> <<That's a different issue.>>You really think so? I would argue that
> it is too closely related to to be ignored.
>
> <<However, that does not change the degree of a table and
> does not change the fact that the degree is a direct measure of the
> dimensions.>> Yes. So. I have never denied that. This is why I
> made a distinction between SQL tables as they are implemented and SQL
> tables as they should be represented. Do you have any idea onto how an
> in memory SQL table footprint looks like on current SQL DBMS?