Re: Why result to insults instead of reasoned arguements? Was: The wisdom of the object mentors

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 2 Jun 2006 18:08:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1149296930.277305.291620_at_i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>


Andrew McDonagh ha escrito:

> putting aside whether or not you have shown Robert Martin's approach to
> be wrong (in any form you care to make).
>
> Why do you feel the need to continually insult Robert and other people
> that you don't agree with?

I only saw insults to the people with an ashaming behavior, not to the people that don't agree with him.

> I think your points about the validity or not of Robert et al, is
> greatly reduced.

Non sequitur. The validity of the points is independent to the insults.

> After all, there are numerous long running discussions on these NGs
> where two or more sides of opinions form, which happily run without insults.

But this does not mean that the insults would not be well deserved. Received on Sat Jun 03 2006 - 03:08:50 CEST

Original text of this message