Re: Why result to insults instead of reasoned arguements? Was: The wisdom of the object mentors
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 2 Jun 2006 18:08:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1149296930.277305.291620_at_i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Date: 2 Jun 2006 18:08:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1149296930.277305.291620_at_i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Andrew McDonagh ha escrito:
> putting aside whether or not you have shown Robert Martin's approach to
> be wrong (in any form you care to make).
>
> Why do you feel the need to continually insult Robert and other people
> that you don't agree with?
> I think your points about the validity or not of Robert et al, is
> greatly reduced.
Non sequitur. The validity of the points is independent to the insults.
> After all, there are numerous long running discussions on these NGs
> where two or more sides of opinions form, which happily run without insults.
But this does not mean that the insults would not be well deserved. Received on Sat Jun 03 2006 - 03:08:50 CEST