Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
From: erk <eric.kaun_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2 Jun 2006 10:37:24 -0700
Message-ID: <1149269844.567874.206240_at_g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Date: 2 Jun 2006 10:37:24 -0700
Message-ID: <1149269844.567874.206240_at_g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Tony D wrote:
> What hope for OO in following any similar path ?
> None, so far as I can see - even with "aspect oriented programming"
> looming into view.
Ugh. O-O will continue to incorporate functional and then relational
concepts in hideous ways, resulting in a chimera with odious flatulence
and astonishingly bad breath.
> I admit, it was embarrassing in the '90s to still admit that the
> majority of the world's code was in COBOL. But did we really have to
> try changing that ratio by generating mountains of boilerplate Java
> junk for even the simplest of applications ?
- erk