Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:18:37 +0300
Message-ID: <e5mlp5$lqh$1_at_nntp.aioe.org>


"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox_at_dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message news:sxtsljxfome3$.nxcpez0f5mdg.dlg_at_40tude.net...
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:01:18 +0300, x wrote:
>
> > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox_at_dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message
> > news:1lrornqlsngid.1g1itr3c2tr04$.dlg_at_40tude.net...
> >> On 1 Jun 2006 02:58:43 -0700, Erwin wrote:

> >> I don't see much difference in respect of identity. The standpoint is
that
> >> there is no data, only behavior.
> >
> >> Data is expressed in observed behavior.
> >
> > What this means ? How ?
> > The change of data is the data but there is no data ?

> How do you change data, what is the effect of a change?

No. How can I observe the behavior if there is no data.

> Both are specified
> in operations. Let you have changed the data, but the effect of all
> operations you could apply to, is same as before. How can you determine if
> you really did? What if I reverted your change while you looked aside. Can
> you catch me?

I think I'll not catch you 'cause I didn't played this game before. Received on Thu Jun 01 2006 - 14:18:37 CEST

Original text of this message