Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:01:18 +0300
> > Note further that the OO crowd always uses the term with respect to one
> > single thing ("the identity of an object").
> This is not true. As for identity of objects there are many of. For
> example, polymorphic objects have the identity of its specific type. The
> identity of objects in its usual sense is not required in OO. It is quite
> possible to have unidentifiable objects.
> I don't see much difference in respect of identity. The standpoint is that
> there is no data, only behavior.
What this means ? How ?
The change of data is the data but there is no data ? Received on Thu Jun 01 2006 - 13:01:18 CEST