Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)

From: Dmitry A. Kazakov <>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:10:37 +0200
Message-ID: <>

On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 02:50:54 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:

> I'm afraid your confusing OO (ie: *object* oriented) with
> "class-oriented" (like in Java). In a "true OO language", *everything*
> is an object. So functions are objects too. So functions are first-order.

I don't think it could be consistent to have everything an object. Though it is possible to have object corresponding to functions.

Dmitry A. Kazakov
Received on Thu Jun 01 2006 - 10:10:37 CEST

Original text of this message