Bye

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 01:38:43 +0200
Message-ID: <447b85cb$0$31637$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>


Bob Badour wrote:

> Keith H Duggar wrote:
>> mAsterdam wrote:

>>> Keith H Duggar wrote:
>>>> mAsterdam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It takes more stamina to show ignorance in this
>>>>> newsgroup now, than it did say a year ago. I have
>>>>> recently refrained from asking questions revealing
>>>>> ignorance because of anticipated reactions here - even
>>>>> when it would just be about exact wording.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Strange, not my experience here at all. I dropped by a
>>>> few weeks ago, readily admitted I was ignorant,
>>>> participated a little, asked some questions, and was
>>>> treated VERY well. When asking database related
>>>> questions I tried to do so with humility and was not
>>>> vociferous. Could this have been a factor in my
>>>> treatment?
>>>
>>>
>>> But it also helped, that you are very willing to accept
>>> the RM - even thought you do have some gaps in your
>>> knowledge about it - no problem for you here, a few months
>>> of reading will help you putting it in perspective.
>>>
>>> The point is that if you weren't very willing to accept
>>> the RM, my guess is you would not be treated as well, even
>>> if you would have been as humble as you were/are.
> 
> 
> Please note the important distinction between "not willing to accept" 
> and "having not yet accepted". The first is the very definition of 
> closed-minded while the second indicates mere skepticism.

Hey! The stalker runs away with my words and makes BS out of it. Mind you /his/ BS, not mine.

Let the asshole get away with it.

Bye all, we had a good time.

I'll be reading some time and see. Received on Tue May 30 2006 - 01:38:43 CEST

Original text of this message