Re: Poll: Expert user vs. Internals Expert

Marshall wrote:
> Keith H Duggar wrote:
> > Now, I will admit that in some domains "rm -R" can be
> > more immediately dangerous than VI.
>
> Okay, I recognize that there are a lot of people who
> really like emacs, and that they may even have a decent
> case to make, but to say that vi is dangerous is really
> overdoing it.

<vi>
<h1> RM </h1>
<p> emacs is superior to vi </p>
</vi>

It's a shame you didn't think of making the "under the RM heading" argument in favor of vi before me. You must submit to that proof of emacs' superiority.

Now prepare yourself for this one:

<vi>
<h1> RM </h1>
<p> anything under the RM heading is false </p>
</vi>

muahahahaa!

• Keith --