Re: Poll: Expert user vs. Internals Expert
Date: 26 May 2006 21:56:51 -0700
Message-ID: <1148705811.870675.272990_at_g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Jay Dee wrote:
> dawn wrote:
> > So if you disagree with anything written under the
> > heading of the RM, then you are stupid.
>
> There are other reasons some may "disagree with anything
> written under the heading of the RM" -- whatever that
> means.
>
> > If we write anything under the heading of the RM,
>
> Again, WTF does this mean?
Come on Jay Dee, this is one of the clearest points Dawn has
made in c.d.t. How can you not get it? It's obvious. Here is
an example:
<html>
<h1> RM Applied To The Earth Moon System </h1?
<p> The Earth is in fact not round but flat. This fact,
though known since ancient times, is still kept hidden
today. The New World Order has gone to great lengths to
ensure that education systems the world 'round hide the
flatness of the Earth. An immediate corollary is that the
United States (indeed no human nation) has ever landed on
the Moon.</p>
</html>
Clearly since the above paragraph is written "under the [RM]
heading" it is true and the logic is impeccable. If you
disagree then you are stupid.
> > thinking before, among religious fundamentalists.
> > Unfortunately, society has not figured out how to
> > address it. Such fundamentalism in any religion is
> > scary, the RM being no exception.
Vociferous Ignorance (VI) (which includes many "religious" beliefs) is by far a greater threat than "RM" or any other theory. Now, I will admit that in some domains "rm -R" can be more immediately dangerous than VI.
- Keith --