Re: TRM - Morbidity has set in, or not?

"Erwin" <e.smout_at_myonline.be> wrote in message news:1148466875.554921.77460_at_j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

>> As Bob said, after asking Fabian Pascal, it's not an idea about a
>> physical
>> organisation of data storage.

> Wait, let me get this straight. TRM is not a model of data, which I
> take to be, more longwindedly, a model for the logical organisation of
> data. And nor is it a model for the physical organisation of data ?

> Then what is it ? A way of life ? A model for the non-organisation of
> data ? I'll be damned.

LOL
>> If I were you, I'll stop saying things like those above.

> Like what things above ??? And why ???

Like these:
> But then again, these are all just a whole lot of maybees from a closed
> mind with an acute lack of reasoning ability, so I wouldn't bother too
> much if I were you.

>The topic is about TRM. More
> precisely, about the validity of claims that are made about it, either
> for or against it. I have read about TRM. Those readings have left me
> with an open question.

You are not the only one.

> Is posting that question here then such an
> unreasonable thing to do ? I'll be damned.

No.

>> I have nothing against you or against your idea.

> What I had and still have is a question. What I had but no longer have
> is the idea that posing the question would lead to an answer.

Why is that ?

And please, use quotation marks. Received on Wed May 24 2006 - 13:52:38 CEST