Re: Sets and Lists, again

From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ucantrade.com.NOTHERE>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:25:48 -0700
Message-ID: <tr27729nsqmt2i552jbopok6lv2265sfse_at_4ax.com>

On 23 May 2006 13:54:52 -0700, "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote:

[snip]

>So, what is it about the logical ordering or discussion of the nth
>element in a list that makes you think we are talking about an
>implementation? --dawn

If you take a look upthread at one of your posts, you will see that you used the term "implementation". I figured that you were discussing an implementation.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko Received on Wed May 24 2006 - 00:25:48 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gene Wirchenko: "Re: Relation or attribute and why"
Previous message: Rich Ryan: "Poll: Expert user vs. Internals Expert"
Maybe in reply to: David Cressey: "Sets and Lists, again"
In reply to dawn: "Re: Sets and Lists, again"
Next in thread: dawn: "Re: Sets and Lists, again"
Reply: dawn: "Re: Sets and Lists, again"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message