Re: Process Model
From: Frank Hamersley <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 21:22:32 GMT
Message-ID: <s2Lcg.9536$S7.1767_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
>> David Cressey wrote:
>> Should I then conclude you are unable to extract meaning from written
>> english? This might then explain your different understanding of
>> everything written in the language.
>> Your denial reeks of evasion and intellectual dishonesty.
>
> This response reeks of inability to conduct a civil discussion.
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 21:22:32 GMT
Message-ID: <s2Lcg.9536$S7.1767_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
David Cressey wrote:
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>> David Cressey wrote:
>>> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message >>>> David Cressey wrote: >>>>> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
[..]
>>>>> When did I do that? >>>> Oh, puhlease... you know damned well when you did: >>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/msg/58806cd6c7405bb0 >>> >>> Your interpretation of what I wrote is strange, to say the very least. >>> >>> I posited nothing like what you say above.
>> Should I then conclude you are unable to extract meaning from written
>> english? This might then explain your different understanding of
>> everything written in the language.
> > No. You should question your own ability to extract meaning from written > English. > Anyone who would infer your summary from what I wrote is a crank. >
>> Your denial reeks of evasion and intellectual dishonesty.
>
> This response reeks of inability to conduct a civil discussion.
Here comes the *plonk! Pretty soon Bob will be talking to himself in CDT! Thats no problem - he likes the sound (sic) of his own voice!
Meanwhile back at the ranch ...
Cheers, Frank. Received on Tue May 23 2006 - 23:22:32 CEST