Re: TRM - Morbidity has set in, or not?
From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:31:47 +0300
Message-ID: <e4urm7$5j8$1_at_emma.aioe.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:31:47 +0300
Message-ID: <e4urm7$5j8$1_at_emma.aioe.org>
"Erwin" <e.smout_at_myonline.be> wrote in message
news:1148382799.048226.227120_at_j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Gone from the URL/site where I first found it.
> Anyway. Is there anyone who can either affirm or disprove my suspicion
> that there's a concurrency bottleneck in the TRM idea (latent need for
> extraneous serialization) ?
Yes. You.
I cannot see how there can be concurrency bottle necks in an idea.
:-) Received on Tue May 23 2006 - 13:31:47 CEST