Re: TRM - Morbidity has set in, or not?

"Frank Hamersley" <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com> wrote in message news:Fkjcg.8875$S7.8538_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Erwin wrote:
> > Funny things happen to threads about TRM.
> >
> > I remember one thread about its aptness in disk-based environments. It
> > ended in lots of mutual accusations being slung round and about. "You
> > don't know what you're talking about", "You say these problems have
> > been solved but you do not show anything material to convince the
> > outside world", "You make faulty assumptions and then criticize the
> > model for the consequences of your own assumptions, which are flawed."
> > "The only response you have is "trust me, it's no longer a problem",
> > while in the rest of your work, you always require rigid formal proof."
> > That kind of stuff.
> >
> > I remember adding a post to that thread bringing on the subject of
> > concurrent updates. I wanted to point out a possible problem in that
> > area, and asked if anybody else had either also spotted the problem, or
> > could explain why it is not.
> >
> > That post was never responded to, after a few days it was bluntly
> > removed from the thread (!!!), and yet another few days later all of a
> > sudden the entire thread was gone !!!

> Perhaps its the "Twilight Relational Model"? ;-)
He used micro$oft software. Very good filter. Received on Mon May 22 2006 - 16:13:00 CEST