Re: Process Model

From: David Cressey <dcressey_at_verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:33:03 GMT
Message-ID: <j05cg.823$PX3.60_at_trndny09>


"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:V8Gbg.10236$A26.252515_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...

> >>I will assume Coad and Yourdon used 'functional decomposition' in its
> >>engineering sense and not in the computing sense for dividing tasks for
> >>parallel execution.
> >
> > Coad and Yourden were discussing analysis, and mentioned functional
> > decomposition as a way of analyzing the problem domain. They were
building
> > towards a motivation for object oriented analysis, the subject of the
book.
>
> I am familiar with the book. I read it years ago, and I stand by all of
> my earlier statements.

Your understanding of what you read is different from mine.

> You posited some 'thing' unique to object orientation from which others
> could learn or which one could apply to other fields, and you gave it a
> name: 'process model'.

When did I do that? Received on Sun May 21 2006 - 23:33:03 CEST

Original text of this message