Re: Sets and Lists, again
From: David Cressey <dcressey_at_verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 14:42:44 GMT
Message-ID: <EVFbg.667$JL5.641_at_trndny03>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 14:42:44 GMT
Message-ID: <EVFbg.667$JL5.641_at_trndny03>
"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148132310.308203.133240_at_g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> David Cressey wrote:
> > What's a ripple delete? How is it different from an ordinary delete?
>
>
http://www.tincat-group.com/mewsings/2006/01/who-ordered-ripple-delete.html
>
Can you summarize this?
> > If you have sets, why would you have to "insert at this point"?
[no reply]
Again, what does "insert at this point" buy you that insertion into a set
doesn't buy you?
>
> ? Why do you need lists for the purpose of having list operators? Can
> you rephrase?
Sure:
What can you do with lists and list operators that you can't do with sets and set operators? Received on Sat May 20 2006 - 16:42:44 CEST